{"id":266,"date":"2025-05-29T10:00:00","date_gmt":"2025-05-29T10:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/calib.pw\/?p=266"},"modified":"2025-05-30T11:53:20","modified_gmt":"2025-05-30T11:53:20","slug":"what-to-know-about-covid-vaccines-for-children-pregnant-women-after-rfk-jr-s-change","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/calib.pw\/index.php\/2025\/05\/29\/what-to-know-about-covid-vaccines-for-children-pregnant-women-after-rfk-jr-s-change\/","title":{"rendered":"What to know about COVID vaccines for children, pregnant women after RFK Jr.'s\u00a0 change"},"content":{"rendered":"
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) will no longer recommend<\/a> that \u201chealthy\u201d children and pregnant women receive the COVID-19 vaccine, Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced Tuesday.\u00a0<\/p>\n The controversial announcement backtracks on the current CDC guidance that calls for annual COVID boosters for everyone aged 6 months and older.\u00a0<\/p>\n Public health and infectious disease experts said they were surprised and confused about the move, and questioned why the HHS did not offer any reasoning for its decision.\u00a0<\/p>\n Here\u2019s what to know about it: <\/p>\n Kennedy’s decision bypassed the traditional method of vaccine policy, which typically involves two separate agencies and an outside group of experts. <\/p>\n The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) decides whether to approve or authorize a vaccine, and the CDC\u2019s independent vaccine advisory panel convenes in an open public meeting to decide questions like who should get it, when and how often. It then sends recommendations to the CDC director, who signs off on them to make official policy.\u00a0<\/p>\n The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices isn\u2019t scheduled to vote on the COVID vaccine recommendations until late June; Kennedy\u2019s announcement seemingly renders it moot.\u00a0<\/p>\n During its previous meeting in April, committee members discussed whether to continue to recommend widespread COVID boosters or switch to a risk-based strategy targeting only the most vulnerable, but they did not vote.\u00a0<\/p>\n The Department of Health and Human Services did not respond to questions about why the department bypassed the CDC panel and what will happen at its next meeting. <\/p>\n Kennedy made the announcement in a 58-second video<\/a> posted to social platform X. He was flanked in the video by FDA Commissioner Marty Makary and Jay Bhattacharya, head of the National Institutes of Health (NIH).\u00a0<\/p>\n The NIH is not involved in vaccine regulation.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n Absent from the group was anyone representing the CDC, which may or may not have an acting director with the authority to sign off on vaccine recommendations. Susan Monarez, who had previously been acting director, is awaiting Senate confirmation<\/a> and isn’t allowed to serve as acting director at the same time.\u00a0<\/p>\n The HHS secretary isn\u2019t typically involved in vaccine decisions. But without an acting CDC director, Kennedy personally signed off on the panel\u2019s recommendations for chikungunya vaccines earlier this month. <\/p>\n He has not acted on the other recommendations from the same meeting, including the use of a meningitis vaccine and an expansion of RSV vaccines to high-risk adults ages 50-59. Reuters reported earlier this month<\/a> that a Kennedy aide has questioned the RSV and meningitis vaccines.\u00a0<\/p>\n There are no mandates for anyone to get the COVID-19 vaccine, and the number of people getting vaccinated has fallen sharply in recent years. <\/p>\n According to the latest CDC estimates, just 13 percent of eligible children and 14.4 percent of eligible pregnant women received the latest version of the coronavirus vaccine. As Makary and Bhattacharya noted, some other countries don\u2019t recommend routine COVID shots for most healthy children. <\/p>\n But experts said the vaccines still provide a benefit, and the administration\u2019s move left little room for nuance or debate about unintended consequences. <\/p>\n Cutting the shot from the CDC\u2019s list of routine vaccines will make it much more difficult for people who want the shot to get it. Insurance companies will no longer have to cover it, and government programs such as Medicaid won\u2019t either. <\/p>\n While COVID-19 is not at the top of the public\u2019s mind, the CDC has said pregnant women and infants remain at high risk of complications from the disease. Vaccinating pregnant women extends the protection to their unborn child until the child is about 6 months old. <\/p>\n According to the CDC, maternal vaccination during pregnancy reduced the risk of COVID-19-related hospitalization by around 54 percent among infants during the first three months of life.\u00a0<\/p>\n The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) in a statement said it was \u201cconcerned\u201d and \u201cextremely disappointed\u201d by the move. <\/p>\n \u201cAs ob-gyns who treat patients every day, we have seen firsthand how dangerous COVID-19 infection can be during pregnancy and for newborns who depend on maternal antibodies from the vaccine for protection. We also understand that despite the change in recommendations from HHS, the science has not changed,\u201d ACOG President Steven Fleischman said.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n The Infectious Diseases Society of America said in a statement the move \u201cdoes the opposite of what Americans have been asking for when it comes to their health\u2014it takes away choices and will negatively impact them.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\nRFK Jr. blows through agency process<\/h2>\n
Physicians say decision shouldn\u2019t be cut and dried<\/h2>\n